Paste your abstract. Get ten PubMed-indexed journals ranked by realistic acceptance odds, decision time, and scope fit — with suggested reviewers and a journal-specific pre-submission checklist. In ninety seconds.
You submit to a journal that sounded right. Six to ten weeks later, the editor desk-rejects on scope grounds. You start over.
Senior researchers know which journals are realistic for which findings. Early-career researchers don't — and waste a year aiming at journals their methods will never pass.
You only discover the article processing charge after acceptance. Your grant doesn't cover it. The paper sits.
The submission system asks for suggested reviewers. You panic-Google. You forget the one person who would have championed your paper.
Title optional. We parse field, study type, sample size, methods, novelty, and likely red flags from the text itself.
We pull the journals that have actually published work like yours in the last three years — weighted by recency and citation overlap — and score each one against your scope.
Ten journals. Each with an acceptance probability, expected time-to-first-decision, APC, open-access status, suggested reviewers, and the scope-fit reasoning. Export and decide.
250+ million scholarly works, journal-level concepts, h-index, citation patterns. The de-facto open replacement for Microsoft Academic Graph.
Authoritative biomedical indexing. We filter to MEDLINE-indexed journals so your CV stays in PubMed.
Cross-publisher metadata, license info, and APC where disclosed. No vendor lock-in.
Scope fit is scored by a language model trained for scientific editorial reasoning — not a vector cosine similarity that mistakes neighboring topics for matches.
Twenty-nine dollars a month. Cancel anytime. One funded paper makes it worth every cent.
See pricing